Alternative Dispute Resolution

Not all litigation ends with a trial. Alternative dispute resolution methods, such as mediation and arbitration, are available options. If you have questions about these alternative dispute resolution processes, contact a lawyer.

Learn More About Litigation

Whether you are a business owner, developer, creditor, or investor, our attorneys have the experience to protect your rights through litigation. When facing a dispute, we will provide you with the legal support and guidance you need from investigations, discovery, dispute resolution through trial, when necessary. We take a comprehensive approach, employ aggressive strategy, and use our experience to best achieve results in your case. At Rosenfeld & Rinato, our attorneys have a solid reputation and record of results for their representation in complex litigation involving real estate disputes, construction law, commercial disputes, and creditors' rights.

Thank you for contacting Rosenfeld Law Group. Your message has been sent.

Call us now

or use the form below.

We provide strategic aggressive advocacy in and out of court. Trusted litigators. Proven results. Call now at 702-583-6926 or contact us by e-mail to schedule an initial consultation or case evaluation.

Call 702-583-6926 or contact us by e-mail to discuss your case with an experienced Las Vegas, Nevada commercial litigation lawyer. We represent local, national, and international clients in complex commercial litigation.

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is a term that refers to settling legal disputes without going to trial. There are a number of different forms of alternative dispute resolution including arbitration (binding and non-binding), mediation, summary jury trials, mini trials and moderated settlement conferences. Generally, it is thought that ADR is less expensive and less time consuming than traditional litigation. Many states have voluntary, and some have mandatory, ADR programs in place. If you would like to learn more about alternative dispute resolution, contact a litigation attorney at Rosenfeld & Rinato in Las Vegas, Nevada who can answer your questions and help you decide if ADR is a good option for you.

Types of ADR

In arbitration, the parties submit their dispute to a neutral third party arbitrator (or a panel of arbitrators) who decides the case. Arbitration can be binding, in which the arbitrator has the power to render a decision that can be enforced by judicial means, or non-binding, in which the arbitrator renders an advisory finding that the parties can accept or reject.

Mediation is a common form of ADR in which the parties seek the help of a neutral third-party mediator to resolve their case through negotiation. Unlike arbitration, mediation is not adjudicatory and the parties have the power to decide how and if they will come to a resolution. The mediator does not issue a decision; he or she helps the parties reach an agreement by clarifying their positions and goals and encouraging them to work together.

In a summary jury trial, the parties present their cases to a mock jury. The jury's findings are not binding; they just give the parties a preview of how things might work out in a real trial. Parties can agree to participate in summary jury trials, or sometimes, the court may order participation.

A mini trial is similar to non-binding arbitration or a summary jury trial, but in a mini trial, the attorneys present a summary of their cases to the parties' decision makers instead of a neutral third party. The decision makers then negotiate a settlement, generally without their attorneys present. Mini-trials are most effective in commercial disputes in which the parties are businesses that have relatively equal power.

A moderated settlement conference, also known as an early neutral evaluation, is similar to arbitration, but there is more interaction between the parties, attorneys and panelists. The panelists are typically attorneys who hear a shortened presentation of the case from each party and then issue a non-binding decision on liability and/or damages. The idea is that the decision, while not binding on the parties, will help them negotiate more constructively.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Alternative dispute resolution has a number of benefits, including:

Shorter and more efficient that typical litigation and trial
Less expensive than trial
Parties can retain control of the outcome and come up with solutions that work for them
Confidentiality agreements may protect sensitive information, whereas many court documents are public records

ADR does have some disadvantages as well, including:

If a resolution is not reached and the parties proceed to trial, there may be unnecessary delay and expense
Parties may use ADR as a "free" discovery tool to obtain information about the opposing party's trial strategies
No legal precedent will be created
Some parties prefer to have a jury resolve their disputes
If the parties have a difficult relationship, face-to-face negotiations may make things worse

There are a number of different factors that a party should consider when deciding whether to use alternative dispute resolution. The attorney and client should consider the client's goals and interests. If the client wants a quick resolution to the case, ADR may be a good option. The subject matter of the case may also be a determinative factor in deciding whether and what type of ADR to use. A lawyer at Rosenfeld & Rinato in Las Vegas, Nevada who has experience in litigation and ADR can evaluate your situation and explain the options available to you.

DISCLAIMER: This site and any information contained herein are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek competent legal counsel for advice on any legal matter.

Back to Main